vs 1-5 What command in the Bible were the Disciples violating? What was the source for this rabbinical teaching? Name some Christian traditions that arent found in the Bible. Grant points out, "The devout Jewish practice of hand washing before meals, for purposes not of cleanliness but of consecration, was a ceremonial elaboration.... But like other pious ceremonies, the practice could become a mere form, a rigid regulation enforced by appeal to the authority of the tradition of the elders. ...it was one of those relatively new scribal-Pharisaic regulations which worked hardship upon the ordinary rank and file of working people...." The Pharisees had elevated tradition to the same category as scripture. There is nothing wrong with tradition. All churches have traditions, and many of the things we do each Sunday morning are based indirectly on centuries-old traditions. The problem comes when we claim these traditions are as important as Gods word. This is what the Pharisees were doing.
vs 6 Where in Isaiah is this verse found? How do Christians today "honor God with our lips but our heart is from him"? Jesus is quoting Isaiah 29:13, "The Lord says: These people come near to me with their mouth and honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. Their worship of me is made up only of rules taught by men." Many Christians today fall into the trap of striving to honor God through their works while neglecting the more important spiritual matters of love, forgiveness, and compassion. If we love God, we will want to do good works. But if good works is our religion, we may find ourselves feeling cold and empty.
vs 7 What Christian teachings have you observed that are "but rules taught by men"? Why do we humans want to add to Gods word with our own ideas? It seems people want to add rules to Gods commands. We can never leave the simple gospel message alone. We can have good church teachings and even reasonable church teachings. But if these teachings violate Gods word, our religion is in vain. Our traditions and teachings must be solidly based on the Bible. When we start adding to Gods word or subtracting from it, we may create a doctrine that people feel comfortable with, and we may please many people, but we wont please God. This is why I think Christians need to be careful that they dont try to label fashion, trends, or fads which are not addressed in the Bible as "sinful." They may be disgusting, and we may not like them, but Im sure people from 1000 years ago would be shocked by what they would see in our churches today. Does that make us less Christian than they were? Cultures change, fashions change, music styles change. Gods attitude toward sin and immorality is what doesnt change. Lets be careful that we dont allow our traditions in style or dress to be equal with Gods condemnation of murder and adultery.
vs 8-9 Which should be more important in the church Gods word or our tradition? What place should tradition have in the church? How can we guard against making tradition more important than Gods word? We must be careful to not confuse whats really important to God with whats important to us. Obviously whether we worship in a barn or in a stained-glass chapel is irrelevant to God. However, it is important to many. But let us not elevate our opinions of a worship setting to the same respect we should have for Gods word. Tradition gives us an important way to relate our worship to God. Tradition is important and beneficial. But tradition is not unchangeable. There comes a time when traditions change. In the 1500s Martin Luther did something radical he introduced congregational singing in the churches. Now its an accepted part of every Sunday morning, but at one time it caused the old traditions to be changed. Almost every church in America has a variety of musical instruments whether organ, piano, guitar, drums. But in the 1800s there was a great debate about musical instruments many claiming that the organ was from the devil! Tradition changed. I can remember as a teenager a dear church pianist explaining to me how God only uses major keys for church music. Music written in a minor key was not blessed by God! How tradition has changed. When it comes to Gods word, let us be immovable, but when it comes to tradition, let us be flexible.
vs 10-13 How were the Pharisees getting around Gods commandment? What was the end result of this teaching? Why do you think they would come up with this teaching? What was happening here was the Pharisees had figured out a way they could get around taking care of their parents. Instead of helping their parents, they claimed that the help they would have given was a gift to God and therefore they had no responsibility to their parents. It is hard for us to relate to this kind of thinking. But the religious leaders assuaged their guilt with this tradition. Jesus rightly condemns them for breaking one of the ten commandments. Im sure they felt very self-righteous and were probably quite shocked by this statement. It had not occurred to them that they were not honoring their parents. Greed had caused them to invent the tradition and ignore Gods intention. Luccock comments, "...a narrow and intense devotion to religion conceived as a logical system, as a set of rules, rather than as the life of God in the soul of man and a way of love, one to another that such narrowness and intensity can have a hardening effect on character. ... When concern for people and their rights and welfare drops out, leaving only a concern for code and regulation, as empty of love as a textbook on geometry, religion can be a dehumanizing thing."
vs 14-16 What does Jesus mean by this parable? (If you dont understand this parable, read on. The Disciples didnt either!) Jesus is speaking of spiritual matters. Americans seem to be obsessed by materialism those outward things such as food, garment, shelter, good looks. But Jesus teaches that those outward things are not important. Whats important is what goes on in the heart.
vs 17-19 Why do you think the Disciples would have had a difficult time understanding this saying? How did Jesus have to teach Peter this lesson again in the Book of Acts? The Disciples had been raised to believe that certain foods were unclean. In a day with little understanding of germs and small consideration for sanitation, these rules were essential to good health. But since they had been ingrained in them since birth, it was hard for them to see what Jesus was talking about. They were probably thinking about clean and unclean foods. In fact Peter may not have learned this lesson even after Jesus explained it to them. In Acts 10:9-15 we find that Peter receives a vision about eating unclean animals. God sends him this vision so he will receive the visitors from the Roman centurion. It seems Peter didnt quite understand the full implication of Jesus teaching here in Mark., and had to be taught again.
vs 20-23 Name the unclean things Jesus is referring to? What are the causes of these "unclean" things? How do we get rid of them? How does knowing this make us better servants of Christ? Jesus identifies what is really unclean evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance, and folly. Notice none of these evils have anything to do with our appearance, the way we dress, the way we look. They are all from the heart. We only have hope of getting victory over these truly "unclean things by committing our heart to Christ. And then every day we must allow the Holy Spirit to help us overcome the temptation to do all these awful things. In this section Jesus is training his disciples how to be servants. When we realize what is truly important to God, we lose our spiritual arrogance. When we honestly examine ourselves, we realize how unholy we really are. This causes us to be humble and better able to understand others who are struggling with their own temptations. This study on Mark 7:1-23 © 1999 by David Humpal, all rights reserved. Grant: The Interpreters Bible, vol. 7, pg. 747-748 © 1951, Abingdon Press Luccock: The Interpreters Bible, vol. 7, pg. 751 © 1951, Abingdon Press |